Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

833 F.2d 1380

Docket No. 86-5829.

Susan T. Fultz, AKA Susan Fultz-Small v. Mason H. Rose, V

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued and Submitted Nov. 6, 1987. Decided Dec. 11, 1987.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1987-12-11

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Munsingwear, Inc. · Bennett v. Gemmill · United States v. Lewis

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1987-12-11

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Mejia-Paiz v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1997), Williams v. Woodford (2002)

14 federal appellate · 6 district · 5 state decisions

16019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

James A. Beckwith, Wheat Ridge, Colo., for plaintiff-appellee.

James M. Weinberg, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Before ALARCON, NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

¶1

The appeal in the above captioned action is hereby DISMISSED as moot. An appeal must be dismissed as moot when intervening events that do not involve wrongful conduct by the appellee leave the appellate court unable to grant effective relief. In re Combined Metals Reduction Co., 557 F.2d 179, 187 (9th Cir.1977). Fultz sold the Rose property to Mr. and Mrs. Hawkins in compliance with the district court's March 7, 1986 order. Because Mr. and Mrs. Hawkins are not parties to this action, we are no longer able to grant any effective relief from that order or to reach the merits of this appeal.

¶2

In accordance with the Supreme Court's guidance in United States v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S.Ct. 104, 106, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950), we dismiss this appeal and vacate the district court's order entered March 7, 1986. Vacation of the March 7 order shall not operate retroactively and shall have no legal effect on actions or conduct already undertaken in reliance on or under the authority of that order.

/833/f2d/1380 · .json · Public domain