Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 833 F.2d 1420 - Robert P. Sheley v. Richard L. Dugger, Robert A. Butterworth

Robert P. Sheley v. Richard L. Dugger, Robert A. Butterworth’s Empirical Analysis

833 F.2d 1420 · 1987

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
2
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably Harris v. Thigpen (1991), Brown v. Crawford (1990)

20 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

3001987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Wolff v. McDonnell · Bell v. Wolfish · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Hewitt v. Helms

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “disciplinary charges or criminal charges”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “rules and regulations concerning administrative segregation and close management create for inmates a liberty interest in remaining in the general prison population”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “goal of the Close Management Review Team shall be toward returning the inmate to open population as soon as the facts of the case suggest it can be safely done,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.