Shabazz v. Carroll

Nov. 25, 1987.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1987-11-25

2 counsel of record

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 2996 (Legal Services Corporation Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 2996B · 42 U.S.C. § 2996E

Relies on City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · Weinstein v. Bradford

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1987-11-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently August 2005 · most notably Sever v. Alaska Pulp Corp. (1992), United States v. Martinez (1988)

32 federal appellate ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Lennal Khabir Shabazz, in pro per.

Robert A. Pallemon, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before MERRILL, GOODWIN and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

¶1

The defendants-appellees' petition for rehearing is granted. That portion of the opinion entered herein on April 10, 1987, 814 F.2d 1321, that gives Shabazz credit for time spent in state prison against Shabazz's federal sentence is vacated. This court lacks jurisdiction to grant such relief.

¶2

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no active judge had requested a vote on whether to rehearing the matter en banc. (Fed.R.App.P. 35.)

¶3

The suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied.