Everett v. Napper’s Empirical Analysis
833 F.2d 1507 · 1987
Citation profile
47 federal appellate · 3 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 236 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2018 · most notably Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn. (1989), United States v. Four Parcels of Real Property in Greene & Tuscaloosa Counties (1991)
47 federal appellate · 3 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · Schmerber v. State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 236 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“‘where the employer perceives a significant hazard in keeping the employee on the job,’ the employer may suspend the employee with pay even before granting an opportunity to be heard or notice,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“... and all justifiable inferences are to be drawn in his favor.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.