Grubb v. Federal Deposit Insurance’s Empirical Analysis
833 F.2d 222 · 1987
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably Lyons v. Jefferson Bank & Trust (1993), Grubb v. Federal Deposit Insurance (1989)
19 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 248 (§ 11 of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913) · 12 U.S.C. § 91 · 28 U.S.C. § 2408
Relies on Scott v. Armstrong · Merrill v. National Bank of Jacksonville · Frank v. Maryland · Ticonic Nat Bank v. Sprague · Third National Bank in Nashville v. Impac Limited Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is to secure the judgment throughout the appeal process against the possibility of the judgment debtor's insolvency.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““[t]he United States is generally entitled to a stay of execution without giving security because judgments against the United States are paid out of a general appropriation to the Treasury set up specifically for that purpose. See Lightfoot v. Walker, 797 F.2d 505, 507 (7th Cir.1986). The result is that collections of judgments against the United States are usually less cumbersome and time-consuming than collections of judgments against other entities.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Security for damages or costs shall not be required of the United States, any department or agency thereof or any party acting under the direction of any such department or agency on the issuance of process or the institution of any proceeding.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.