Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 833 F.2d 253 - Palmer v. Dugger

Palmer v. Dugger’s Empirical Analysis

833 F.2d 253 · 1987

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
November 2004
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2004

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

50198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 5 U.S.C. § 7324

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Connick v. Myers · Williams v. Illinois · Castor v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The rule in this circuit distilled from prior decisions, as to whether a state prisoner is entitled to federal habeas corpus relief for credit on the service of his sentence for time spent in custody or detention prior to trial or sentencing is: While there is no absolute constitutional right to pre-sentence detention credit as such, where a person is held for a bailable offense and is unable to make bail due to indigency then if he is upon conviction sentenced to the statutory maximum imposable sentence for the offense he is entitled to credit for time spent in jail prior to sentencing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is unable to make bail because of indigence,” and (3)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.