Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 833 F.2d 288 - Pickett v. Bowen

Pickett v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

833 F.2d 288 · 1987

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
June 2016
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2016

5 federal appellate · 1 district ·

501987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 421 (§ 221 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Simpson v. Schweiker · Huie v. Bowen · Clark v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co · Taylor v. Heckler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Typically, both the disability decision and the cessation decision [in a closed period case] are rendered in the same document.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “claimants. 3 IV. 26 Congress enacted the Disability Amendments to ensure that those who deserve disability benefits receive them. Congress also sought to ensure that termination of benefits occurs only after reference to a”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “class members are not entitled to remand, redetermination, and benefits pending redetermination. By not hearing the Secretary's appeal now, the Secretary would have to redetermine the claim and pay benefits pending redetermination, thereby rendering his present objection moot and judicial review meaningless. III. 10 This appeal presents a question of first impression in this Circuit: Are”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.