Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

833 F.2d 310

Docket Nos. 87-7601, 87-7602.

Michael Sewell Smith v. Dr. Eason, Dr. Oppenheim, Virginia Beach Sheriff's Department, Deputy Sheriff Houston, Sandra Y. Wiese, Nurse, Michael Butler, Nurse, Cindy Finn, Nurse, Steve, (Last Name Unknown), Nurse, and Unknown Supervisors, Correctional Officers, Unnamed Floor Sergeant, Michael Sewell Smith v. Dr. Eason, Dr. Oppenheim, Virginia Beach Sheriff's Department, Deputy Sherriff Houston, Sandra Y. Wiese, Nurse, Michael Butler, Nurse, Cindy Finn, Nurse, Steve, (Last Name Unknown), Nurse, and Unknown Supervisors, Correctional Officers, Unnamed Floor Sergeant

Full caption · 2 consolidated cases

  • Michael Sewell SMITHv.Dr. EASON, Dr. Oppenheim, Virginia Beach Sheriff's Department, Deputy Sheriff Houston, Sandra Y. Wiese, Nurse, Michael Butler, Nurse, Cindy Finn, Nurse, Steve, (Last Name Unknown), Nurse, and unknown supervisors, correctional officers, Unnamed Floor Sergeant
  • Michael Sewell SMITHv.Dr. EASON, Dr. Oppenheim, Virginia Beach Sheriff's Department, Deputy Sherriff Houston, Sandra Y. Wiese, Nurse, Michael Butler, Nurse, Cindy Finn, Nurse, Steve, (Last Name Unknown), Nurse, and unknown supervisors, correctional officers, Unnamed Floor Sergeant

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Sept. 25, 1987. Decided Oct. 27, 1987.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1987-10-27

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Franklin J. Loftis v. William D. Leeke, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1987-10-27

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Michael Sewell Smith, appellant pro se.

John William Eppler, Harlan, Knight, Dudley & Pincus, James Walter Hooper, Gardner, Moss & Hooper, for appellees.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Michael Sewell Smith, a Virginia inmate, appeals from orders of the district court dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action as to seven defendants. The orders appealed from are not final. They do not dispose of all of the claims or all of the parties within the meaning of Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). Deputy Sheriff Houston still remains as a defendant in the action. Until the district court renders a final judgment as to all the defendants, we have no jurisdiction to review the orders. For this reason, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

¶2

DISMISSED.

/833/f2d/310 · .json · Public domain