Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 833 F.2d 565 - Stephan L. Honore v. James M. Douglas

Stephan L. Honore v. James M. Douglas’s Empirical Analysis

833 F.2d 565 · 1987

Citation profile

90
cited by 90 later decisions
3
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

30 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably Kauth v. Hartford Insurance Co. of Illinois (1988), Dixon v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. (1992)

30 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

45019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is likewise an inadequate procedure for sorting out nebulous questions of motivation”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to clear [his] name.” Id. As such, Dr. Raju has not been deprived of liberty without due process. 17 . The court notes at the outset that although it is not to give “slavish deference to a university’s arbitrary deprivation of a vested ... right,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “must demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact about his protected property interest ... and the university's arbitrary or capricious deprivation of that interest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.