Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 833 F.2d 639 - Howland v. Kilquist

Howland v. Kilquist’s Empirical Analysis

833 F.2d 639 · 1987

Citation profile

248
cited by 248 later decisions
3
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

93 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 248 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably United States v. Moya-Gomez (1988), Smith v. Maschner (1990)

93 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

189019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Wolff v. McDonnell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 248 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]n act in retaliation for the exercise of a constitutionally protected right is actionable under Section 1983 even if the act, when taken for different reasons, would have been proper.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the disputed fact is outcome determinative under governing law.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.