Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 833 F.2d 763 - Bresgal v. Brock

Bresgal v. Brock’s Empirical Analysis

833 F.2d 763 · 1987

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
September 2003
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 3121 (Federal Insurance Contributions Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 29 U.S.C. § 1801 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 1802 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 7 U.S.C. § 2041

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroy · Heckler v. Chaney · Rizzo v. Goode · Califano v. Yamasaki

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is unfortunately an all too common experience for workers to be abused by farm labor contractors. Testimony revealed that in many cases the contractor: exaggerates conditions of employment when he recruits workers in their home base, or that he fails to inform them of their working conditions at all; transports them in unsafe vehicles; fails to furnish promised housing, or else furnishes substandard and unsanitary housing; operates a company store while making unitemized deductions from workers’ paychecks for purchases, and pays the workers in cash without records of units worked or taxes withheld. 20”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “means employment in any service or activity included within the provisions of section 3(f) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 203(f)), or section 3121(g) of Title 26 and the handling, planting, drying, packing, packaging, processing, freezing, or grading prior to delivery for storage of any agricultural or horticultural commodity in its un-manufactured state. 29 U.S.C. § 1802 (3). 10 . (8)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the term”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he conditions that Congress addressed in the [MSPA], and the persons protected, are the same in the forestry industry as in more conventional agricultural industries.” Bresgal, 833 F.2d at 766 . 22 . Bresgal, 833 F.2d at 766 (quoting Bresgal, 637 F.Supp. at 277 ); cf. Almendarez v. Barrett-Fisher Co., 762 F.2d 1275 , 1281 (5th Cir.1985) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.