DeGurules v. Immigration & Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis
833 F.2d 861 · 1987
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2011 · most notably Landgraf v. USI Film Products (1994), United States v. Ameline (2004)
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (§ 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Phinpathya · Brown v. Baden · Oakland Tribune, Inc. v. Chronicle Publishing Co. · Brown v. Baden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] fundamental principle of our jurisprudence is that a court will apply the law as it exists when rendering its decision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hostler v. Groves
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.