United States v. Monroe’s Empirical Analysis
833 F.2d 95 · 1987
Citation profile
31 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently April 2014 · most notably United States v. Mentz (1988), United States v. White (1993)
31 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Stovall v. Denno · Patterson v. United States · Jones v. Howard · B.D. International Discount Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining whether the delay attributable to a co-defendant is reasonable, courts 'are guided by the purpose Congress intended to serve when it enacted section 3161(h)(7).'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“counsel specifically consented to the exclusion of this time in the interest of justice and thereby waived any objections thereto”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.