Piszel v. States’s Empirical Analysis
833 F.3d 1366 · 2016
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from United States Court of Federal Claims)
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1452 · 12 U.S.C. § 1454 · 12 U.S.C. § 1716 · 12 U.S.C. § 4511 · 12 U.S.C. § 4518 (Equity in Government Compensation Act of 2015) · 12 U.S.C. § 4617 · 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Relies on Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City · Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City · Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council · Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp. · United States Trust Company of New York v. New Jersey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.