Constand v. Cosby’s Empirical Analysis
833 F.3d 405 · 2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Rizzo v. Goode · North Carolina v. Rice · Marco Defunis et al. v. Charles Odegaard, President of the University of Washington. · Church of Scientology of California v. United States · U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e simply do not have the power, even if we were of the mind to use it if we had, to make what has thus become public private again.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“seeking to restrain further dissemination of publicly disclosed information are moot.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.