Daniel v. Cook County’s Empirical Analysis
833 F.3d 728 · 2016
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997 (Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act)
Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Estelle v. Gamble · Farmer v. Brennan · City of Canton v. Harris · Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to the order. Id. at 743 (internal quotation marks omitted). Based on this and other provisions in the document, the court held that the district court did not err in declining to take judicial notice of the agreed order. Unlike Saccameno, however, the plaintiff in Daniel specifically asked the court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“routinely take judicial notice of the actions of other courts or the contents of filings in other courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“would not be admissible against Defendants except in a proceeding involving the parties”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.