Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 833 F.3d 866 - Fuller v. Lynch

Fuller v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis

833 F.3d 866 · 2016

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
January 2019
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1186A (§ 216 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Calle-Vujiles v. Ashcroft · N-A-M · Bromfield v. Mukasey · Pilch v. Ashcroft · Krishnapillai v. Holder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “) initiated removal proceedings against him. The government charged, and the Board would later agree, that Fuller was removable from the United States pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (a)(1)(D)(i) because he had lost his conditional permanent resident status. (In 2004, Fuller and his wife, whom he divorced the following year, failed to appear for a mandatory interview with immigration officials, triggering the revocation of his conditional residency status.) 2 And because, as the Board would also agree, Fuller's conviction for attempted criminal sexual assault constituted a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[Fuller] has shown no clear error in the Immigration Judge's detailed findings of fact, to include the findings that the respondent did not credibly testify and did not establish that he has ever been bisexual. The respondent's inconsistent statements and implausible explanations fully support an adverse credibility determination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Fuller's inability to recall significant details”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.