United States v. Colhoff’s Empirical Analysis
833 F.3d 980 · 2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1512 · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Olano · Puckett v. United States · Virginia v. Black · Doe ex rel. Doe v. Pulaski County Special School District · United States v. J.H.H.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“are of the same or similar character, or are based on the same act or transaction, or are connected with or constitute parts of a common scheme or plan.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.