Hogarth v. Thornburgh’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 29 U.S.C. § 701 (Employment Opportunities for Individuals With Disabilities Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 706 · 29 U.S.C. § 791 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 29 U.S.C. § 794A · 42 U.S.C. § 2000D · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Southeastern Community College v. Davis · School Board of Nassau County Florida v. H Arline · Alexander v. Choate · B.D. International Discount Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. · Porter v. States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f a handicap manifests itself in certain behavior, and an employee is discharged because of that behavior, he has been terminated 'solely by reason of' the handicap.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[W]here the issue to be decided is the likelihood that an event will occur, the fact that it did occur is perhaps the most probative evidence possible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“has consistently litigated this action as a straightforward anti-discrimination claim cognizable under section 501 or section 504,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lassiter v. Reno
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.