Friday v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 44 Colo. App. 533 - People v. Shaw · 84 Misc. 2d 737 - People v. Jones · People v. Powell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any 1 person who falsely personates another, and in such assumed character: [[Image here]] 4. Does any other act whereby, if it were done by the person falsely personat-ed, he might in any event become liable to any suit or prosecution, or to pay any sum of money, or to incur any charge, forfeiture, or penalty, or whereby any benefit might accrue to the party personating, or to any other person— Is punishable by imprisonment in the pemtentiary not exceeding ten years.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Barkus v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.