Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Young · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · State v. Delva · 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State · 403 So. 2d 956 - Ray v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“both sides acknowledged that the issues were whether [the defendant] had control of the drugs and whether he had knowledge of the illegality of the substances”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the error must reach down into the validity of the trial itself to the extent that a verdict of guilty could not have been obtained without the assistance of the alleged error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“An error is fundamental when it goes to the foundation of the case or the merits of the cause of action and is equivalent to a denial of due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.