Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

833 So. 2d 649

Cloud v. Cloud

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 26, 2002

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · decided 2002-04-26

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 2015

3 state decisions

Relies on Griffin v. Bank Street Finance · 624 So. 2d 639 - Jones v. Seibert

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-04-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

YATES, Presiding Judge,

¶1dissenting.

¶2Although Rickey Cloud petitioned the court for the appointment of a commissioner to take his deposition during his incarceration in order to preserve his testimony, his pro se brief fails to comply with Rule 28, Ala. R.App. P. The Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure apply equally to members of the bar and to parties proceeding pro se. Jones v. Seibert, 624 So.2d 639 (Ala.Civ.App.1993). Although the result may sometimes seem harsh, this court has consistently held that when an appellant fails to comply with Rule 28, this court will affirm the judgment of the trial court. Black v. Allen, 587 So.2d 349 (Ala.Civ.App.1991). Therefore, I dissent.

/833/so2d/649 · .json · Public domain