Allstate Ins. Co. v. Suarez’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 819 So. 2d 732 - Siegle v. Progressive Consumers Ins. Co. · Johnson v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. · 441 So. 2d 175 - State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Oliveras · 687 So. 2d 1331 - Florida Farm Bureau Ins. Co. v. Sheaffer · Allstate Ins. Co. v. Suarez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The appraisers will state separately the value of the residential property and the amount of loss. If they fail to agree, they will submit their difference to the umpire. A decision agreed to by any two will be binding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Once a trial court has determined that the appraisal provisions of a contract of insurance have been properly invoked, further proceedings should be conducted in accord with those provisions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.