Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

833 So. 2d 795

Diaz-Perna v. Evens

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-06-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2010

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-06-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Pedro Diaz-Perna appeals an order denying unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm.

¶2Under the unemployment compensation law, an employee is disqualified for benefits when “he or she has voluntarily left his or her work without good cause attributable to his or her employing unit .... ” § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001). In this case the appellant quit his employment because he believed he was going to be terminated or have his salary reduced. Under the unemployment compensation law, that constitutes voluntarily leaving the employment without good cause attributable to the employing unit. Id. Thus, unemployment benefits were correctly denied under the applicable statute.

¶3Affirmed.

/833/so2d/795 · .json · Public domain