Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 833 SO2D 828 - State v. McCord

State v. McCord’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Frazier v. Cupp · 803 So. 2d 598 - Connor v. State · United States v. Briley · United States v. Hurtado

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he detective in this case fabricated a rape charge to obtain McCords consent. Even the detective testified that McCord consented to giving a sample only because he wanted to clear his name in a non-existent case. We agree with the trial court that this deception, while McCord was in jail, was so manipulative that his "consent" did not "validate the search."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “was taken upon the `premise of a fictitious rape to which the detective knew was non-existent,' the court determined that McCord involuntarily consented and suppressed the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “his consent was involuntary and obtained in violation of his due process rights as a result of the detective's deceitful tactics.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.