Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 833 SO2D 92 - Bishop v. State

Bishop v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 700 So. 2d 1374 - Etherton v. City of Homewood · 613 So. 2d 1283 - King v. Garrett · 516 So. 2d 944 - Jenkins v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The appellate court may, on motion of a party or on its own initiative, order that a supplemental or corrected record be certified and transmitted to the appellate court if necessary to correct an omission or misstatement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.