Ex Parte Langley’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably Spriggs v. Collins (1993), Vaughn v. State (1996)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ex Parte Duffy · Ex Parte Felton · Craig v. State · Ex Parte Klasing · Houlihan v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well-settled that a probated sentence is not a final conviction for enhancement purposes unless it is revoked. When a defendant receives “regular” probation ... he is convicted and punishment is assessed. However, the imposition of the sentence is suspended, and the conviction does not become final for purposes of enhancement unless the probation is revoked. [Emphasis added.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Throneberry v. State“1. whether the defendant received reasonably effective assistance of counsel, i.e.,whether counsel was reasonably likely to render effective assistance; and 2. whether counsel reasonably rendered effective assistance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Melonson v. State“A successfully served probation is not available for enhancement purposes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex parte Pue
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.