Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. State · Stark v. State · Yanez v. State · Smith v. State · Latham v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial judge, on the demand of the defendant or his attorney, or of the State’s counsel, shall cause a sufficient number of jurors from which a jury may be selected to try the case to be randomly selected from the members of the general panel drawn or assigned as jurors in the case. The clerk shall randomly select the jurors by a computer or other process of random selection and shall write or print the names, in the order selected, on the jury list from which a jury is to be selected to try the case. The clerk shall deliver a copy of the list to the State’s counsel and to the defendant or his attorney.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Ford v. State · Ford v. State“We have held many times that a defendant has the absolute right to a shuffle of the jury panel, pursuant to Article 35.11.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Garza v. State“[t]he statute ... contemplates that court business will be conducted in the courtroom.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Chappell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.