Haight v. Williamson’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 2023
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Santobello v. New York · Ricketts v. Adamson · United States v. Anderson · James H. Turner v. State of Tennessee · Workman v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] writ of prohibition may be granted upon a showing that (1) the lower court is proceeding or is about to proceed outside of its jurisdiction and there is no remedy through an application to an intermediate court; or (2) that the lower court is acting or is about to act erroneously, although within its jurisdiction, and there exists no adequate remedy by appeal or otherwise and great injustice and irreparable injury will result if the petition is not granted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Saleba v. Schrand“Issuance of, or refusal to issue a writ of prohibition is in the sound discretion of the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Peterson v. Shake“); Rowley v. Lampe, Ky., 331 S.W.2d 887 (1960) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Peterson v. Shake
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.