Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 834 F.2d 1269 - Stamps v. Rees

Stamps v. Rees’s Empirical Analysis

834 F.2d 1269 · 1987

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
February 2011
most recently cited

28 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently February 2011 · most notably William A. Rose v. Al C. Parke (1988), Ward v. United States (1993)

28 federal appellate ·

1801987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Rose v. Lundy · Granberry v. Greer · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · Wiley v. Sowders

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'bench mark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel's conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversary process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he defendant must show that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense. This requires showing that counsel's errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “imposed a heavy dual burden upon anyone claiming ineffective assistance of counsel.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.