Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 834 F.2d 145 - United States v. Byrd

United States v. Byrd’s Empirical Analysis

834 F.2d 145 · 1987

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2021

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

9019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 17 · 18 U.S.C. § 2113

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Patterson v. New York · United States v. McCaghren · United States v. Amos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rebuttal provides the government with the opportunity to respond to defendant's arguments. It does not allow the government to bring in new matters.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.