Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 834 F.2d 161 - Luna v. Bowen

Luna v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

834 F.2d 161 · 1987

Citation profile

362
cited by 362 later decisions
August 2017
most recently cited

121 federal appellate · 129 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 362 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably Williams v. Bowen (1988), Casias v. Secretary of Health & Human Services (1991)

121 federal appellate · 129 district ·

20701987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Bowen v. Yuckert · Duncan v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · 14 soc.sec.rep.ser. 301, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 16,883 Ernest S. Avery v. Secretary of Health and Human Services · Polaski v. Heckler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 362 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if an impairment is reasonably expected to produce some pain, allegations of disabling pain emanating from that impairment are sufficiently consistent to require consideration of all relevant evidence.”
    31 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he impairment or abnormality must be one which 'could reasonably be expected to produce' the alleged pain.”
    24 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the possibility that psychological disorders combine with physical problems”
    18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.