Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 834 F.2d 493 - Lyons v. Sheetz

Lyons v. Sheetz’s Empirical Analysis

834 F.2d 493 · 1987

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
April 2014
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2014 · most notably Topalian v. Ehrman (1992), Valley Ranch Development Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance (1992)

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

901987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Allen v. McCurry · Pierson v. Ray · Butz v. Economou · Stump v. Sparkman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that relies on legal points that are not arguable on the merits.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When a dismissal of a pro se complaint is warranted, it should generally be without prejudice in order to afford the plaintiff the opportunity to file an amended complaint.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]f a court of appeals shall determine that an appeal is frivolous, it may ... award just damages and single or double costs to the appellee.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Walker

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.