United Association Of Journeymen And Apprentices Of The Plumbing And Pipe Fitting Industry Of The United States And Canada, Local Number 57 v. Bechtel Power Corporation’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Ethridge V. Harbor House Restaurant (1988), Mock v. T.G. & Y. Stores Co. (1992)
18 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on Franchise Tax Board of the State of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern California · Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams · Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon · Gully v. First Nat. Bank in Meridian
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“federal courts look beyond the allegations of the complaint ... to determine whether the wrong complained of actually arises in some manner from a breach of the defendants' obligations under a collective bargaining agreement.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Charles Mock v. T.G. & Y. Stores Co., an Oklahoma Corporation, Household International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Household Merchandising, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, Jim L. Clymer v. T.G. & Y. Stores Co., an Oklahoma Corporation, Household International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Household Merchandising, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, Gary Bailey, Dwayne Hope, Jimmy Hope, Patty Hudson, Glenda Morton, Charles Edwards Owens, Victor E. Silva, Kim Louise Souders v. T.G. & Y. Stores Co., an Oklahoma Corporation, Household International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Household Merchandising, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, the General Drivers, Chauffeurs, Helpers, Local Union 886, Affiliated With the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Gary Bailey, Dwayne Hope, Jimmy Hope, Patty Hudson, Glenda Morton, Charles Edwards Owens, Victor E. Silva, Kim Louise Souders v. T.G. & Y. Stores Co., an Oklahoma Corporation, Household International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Household Merchandising, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, and the General Drivers, Chauffeurs, Helpers, Local Union 886, Affiliated With the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America · Fry v. Airline Pilots Association, International“[p]laintiffs ... often [attempt] to avoid federal jurisdiction under § 301 by framing their complaints in terms of such diverse state law theories as wrongful discharge, intentional infliction of emotional distress, conspiracy, and misrepresentation.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Charles Mock v. T.G. & Y. Stores Co., an Oklahoma Corporation, Household International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Household Merchandising, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, Jim L. Clymer v. T.G. & Y. Stores Co., an Oklahoma Corporation, Household International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Household Merchandising, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, Gary Bailey, Dwayne Hope, Jimmy Hope, Patty Hudson, Glenda Morton, Charles Edwards Owens, Victor E. Silva, Kim Louise Souders v. T.G. & Y. Stores Co., an Oklahoma Corporation, Household International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Household Merchandising, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, the General Drivers, Chauffeurs, Helpers, Local Union 886, Affiliated With the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Gary Bailey, Dwayne Hope, Jimmy Hope, Patty Hudson, Glenda Morton, Charles Edwards Owens, Victor E. Silva, Kim Louise Souders v. T.G. & Y. Stores Co., an Oklahoma Corporation, Household International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Household Merchandising, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, and the General Drivers, Chauffeurs, Helpers, Local Union 886, Affiliated With the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America · Fry v. Airline Pilots Association, International“`questions relating to what the parties to a labor agreement agreed, and what legal consequences were intended to flow from breaches of that agreement.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.