Godoy v. Spearman’s Empirical Analysis
834 F.3d 1078 · 2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · United States v. Olano · Williams v. Taylor · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the jury was not sure what was going on or what procedurally would happen next.” (emphasis added). The phrase”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Godoy v. Spearman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.