Mathis v. McDonald’s Empirical Analysis
834 F.3d 1347 · 2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 5103A · 38 U.S.C. § 5125
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Richardson v. Perales · Bradshaw v. Richey · Riggle v. United States · Cook v. Principi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must make a specific objection to an examiner's competence before she can learn the examiner's qualifications.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Mathis v. Shulkin“whether an examiner is competent and whether he has rendered an adequate exam are two separate inquiries.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Francway v. Wilkie
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.