Nicosia v. Amazon.com, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
834 F.3d 220 · 2016
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 2051 (Consumer Product Safety Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 2052 · 15 U.S.C. § 2073 · 9 U.S.C. § 2 · 9 U.S.C. § 4
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Lewis Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Casey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 120 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“consider all relevant admissible evidence”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Although past injuries may provide a basis for standing to seek money damages, they do not confer standing to seek injunctive relief unless the plaintiff can demonstrate that she is likely to be harmed again in the future in a similar way.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“courts apply a 'standard similar to that applicable for a motion for summary judgment.'”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.