Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 834 F.3d 904 - Reece v. Colvin

Reece v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis

834 F.3d 904 · 2016

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
January 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Prosch v. Apfel · Dennis W. Pearsall v. Larry Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social Security · Singh v. Apfel · Hacker v. Barnhart · Rita A. Hogan v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a treating physician's opinion is usually entitled to great weight, it does not automatically control, since the record must be evaluated as a whole.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.