Diebitz v. Arreola’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2015
2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Bates v. State Bar · Israel v. Futuronics Corp. · Butler v. United States · Archie v. City of Racine · Spallone v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not intended merely to relitigate old matters nor are such motions intended to allow the parties to present the case under new theories.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nelson v. Driscoll
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.