Data General Corp. v. Grumman Systems Support Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 17 U.S.C. § 101 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 410 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States · Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc. · American Tobacco Co. v. United States · Copperweld Corporation v. Independence Tube Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no evidence which would warrant a finding of the existence of a tying agreement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.