Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 834 FSUPP 903 - Peck v. Tegtmeyer

Peck v. Tegtmeyer’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently May 2010

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

60199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Erie Co v. Tompkins · Anne Sweeney v. William G Errving · McConnell v. Williams · Danville Community Hospital, Inc. v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A witness shall be qualified to testify as an expert on the standard of care if he demonstrates expert knowledge of the standards of the defendant’s specialty and if he has had active clinical practice in either the defendant’s specialty or a related field of medicine within one year of the date of the alleged act or omission forming the basis of the action.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “While the qualification requirements may be viewed as 'procedural' rules, they are ‘intimately bound up’ with a state substantive rule, the standard of care itself” and thus”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In other words, under the statutory scheme, the standard of care is that which is testified to by an expert qualified under the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.