Pasquantonio v. Poley’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · Villa Marina Yacht Sales, Inc. v. Hatteras Yachts · Currie v. Group Insurance Commission · Jiménez v. Rodríguez-Pagán
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“circumstances. See id. ; see also Currie v. Grp. Ins. Comm'n , 290 F.3d 1 , 10 (1st Cir. 2002). To help ascertain whether”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Figueroa v. Cestero
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.