Berry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 2019
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Manson v. Brathwaite · Arizona v. Hicks · Hall v. State · Rudd v. State · 16 Okla. Crim. 549 - Muldrow v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) prior opportunity of the witness to observe the defendant during the alleged criminal act; 2) degree of attention of the witness; 3) accuracy of the witness’ prior identifi- . cation; 4) the witness’ level of certainty; and, 5) the time between the crime and the confrontation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“When a defendant, upon arraignment, pleads to the merits and enters on trial, he waives . . . any irregularities [in the preliminary examination].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. GORDON v. STATE · THOMPSON v. STATE“[A]ny error arising from the lack of a preliminary hearing on second and subsequent charges was waived by the defendant's entry of a plea to the information and his proceeding to trial without timely offering any objections to the information.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. THOMPSON v. STATE
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.