Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 834 P.2d 592 - State v. Parker

State v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
July 2006
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Florida v. Royer · Delaware v. Prouse · Berkemer v. McCarty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[P]eace officers, state patrolmen, and others duly authorized by the [motor vehicle] department or by law shall have the power and it shall be their duty: . . . . (b) To make arrests upon view and without warrant for any violation committed in their presence of any of the provisions of this act or other law regulating the operation of vehicles or the use of the highways.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]t is difficult to imagine any circumstances surrounding a routine traffic stop in which [an arrest] would be justified.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.