Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 834 SO2D 190 - Garden v. Garden

Garden v. Garden’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Harreld v. Harreld · Conner v. Conner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Withdrawal at the moment a trial is to commence can seldom be accomplished without material adverse effect on the client. Thus, rule 4 — 1.16(c) authorizes the court to require continued representation of the client by counsel, even in those instances where good cause to withdraw exists. - • In those circumstances the court is not required to grant a motion to withdraw and may properly require a lawyer who has tardily moved to withdraw to continue representing the client.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The attorney shall file a motion [to withdraw] stating the reasons for the withdrawal and the client’s address. A copy of the motion shall be served on the client and adverse parties. The motion shall be set for hearing and notice of hearing shall be served on the client and adverse parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The notice requirement implicates due process concerns of notice and opportunity to be heard; obviously, then, the notice and motion must be timely and must afford the client an opportunity to respond.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.