834 So. 2d 311 - King v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
February 2009
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 576 So. 2d 953 - Saavedra v. State · Eaddy v. State · 811 So. 2d 714 - Morman v. State · 757 So. 2d 1227 - Nicholson v. State · 755 So. 2d 155 - Pryor v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Within each day's episode there was practically simultaneous touching of two proscribed areas (breast and buttocks areas on Friday, and breast and genital areas on Saturday). Thus, the various lewd and lascivious acts were not sufficiently discrete for them to be deemed separate offenses within each episode. Upon remand, the court must strike two convictions as violating double jeopardy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he same victim was involved; the attack occurred solely on the sofa; and there was no meaningful temporal break in the episode.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.