834 So. 2d 344 - Alexandre v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2004
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Delgado v. State · 823 So. 2d 253 - Johnekins v. State · 828 So. 2d 445 - Miller v. State · 830 So. 2d 177 - Couzo v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Before you can find the defendant guilty of burglary, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt. Element number one, the defendant entered or remained in a structure owned by or in the possession of New Life Church of.God. Number two, the defendant did not have the permission or consent of New Life Church of God, or anyone authorized to act for them, to enter or remain in the structure at the time. Number three, at the time of entering or remaining in the structure, the defendant had a fully formed conscious intent to commit the offense of theft in that structure. A person may be guilty of this offense if he entered into or remained in areas of the premises which he knew or should have known, were not open to the public, if he had the intent to commit the crime described in the charge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dixon v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.