Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

834 So. 2d 405

Matisko v. Matisko

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 17, 2003

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2003-01-17

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2003

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-01-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1AFFIRMED.

¶2Husband has failed to demonstrate any error in the rulings made by the trial court. Specifically, husband has failed to show that it was error to award wife all of the marital home, which was hers by inheritance, as her separate property. Nor did the trial court err in excluding certain evidence as irrelevant to the issues in the case. Finally, the husband’s failure to obtain a ruling on his motion for sanctions precludes consideration on appeal of whether the motion should have been granted.

SHARP, W„ GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
/834/so2d/405 · .json · Public domain