Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

834 So. 2d 421

Docket No. 2D01-5604.

Carmichael v. State

Dwight Dale CARMICHAEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 17, 2003.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2003-01-17

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 2005

2 state decisions

Relies on Johnston v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-01-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Andrea Norgard, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

¶2Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

¶3DAVIS, Judge.

¶4Dwight Dale Carmichael challenges the revocation of his probation, arguing that no affidavit of violation appears in the record. We reverse.

¶5An order revoking probation should be vacated if no formal charge of violation of probation has been filed, and this issue may be raised for the first time on appeal. Johnston v. State, 684 So.2d 262 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

¶6Here, no affidavit of probation appears in the record, and the Highlands County clerk of circuit court has filed a "certificate of non-existence," stating that "a diligent search has been made for the Affidavit of Violation of Probation, and said document does not exist or cannot be located."

¶7Although Carmichael's probation officer testified that she had "submitted" an affidavit of violation, this does not prove that the affidavit was formally filed. Accordingly, we reverse the revocation order.

¶8Reversed.

¶9SALCINES and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

/834/so2d/421 · .json · Public domain