Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 834 SO2D 533 - State v. Santee

State v. Santee’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

23 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 436 So. 2d 475 - State v. Kahey · 338 So. 2d 107 - State v. Ford · 365 So. 2d 1304 - State v. Phillips · 742 So. 2d 604 - State v. Williams · 728 So. 2d 14 - State v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “15A. A defendant charged with an offense other than one punishable by death may knowingly and intelligently waive a trial by jury and elect to be tried by the judge. At the time of arraignment, the-defendant in such cases shall be informed by the court of his right to waive "trial by jury. B. The defendant shall exercise his right to waive trial by jury in accordance with the time limits set forth in Article 521. However, with permission of the court, he may exercise his .right to waive trial by jury at any time prior to the commencement of trial. C. The defendant may withdraw a waiver of trial by jury unless the court finds that withdrawal of the waiver would result in interference with the administration of justice, unnecessary delay, unnecessary inconvenience to witnesses, or prejudice to the state.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We find no error in the determination of tbe trial judge here that the present defendant gave his informed consent to the waiver made in his presence by his attorney, especially in light of the facts that the judge had informed defendant not once, but twice, of his right to choose between a judge trial and a jury trial, and that the defendant was shown to have had prior experience as an accused in the trial of a criminal prosecution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.